Skip to content

Services

Strategic Tax Planning

Pre-transaction modeling, entity optimization, and appellate defense for enterprises and high-net-worth individuals — treating tax liability as a controllable expense, not a year-end surprise.

What you get

Outcomes

  • Effective corporate tax rate reduced from 34.9% to 25.17% through a structured Section 115BAA concessional regime transition
  • Capital gains tax on a high-value real estate sale legally reduced by 40–60% via Section 54 series exemption modeling before the sale deed was signed
  • Section 148 reassessment demand dropped at CIT(A) — evidentiary dossier filed within 15 working days of the original notice
  • Cross-border remittance of ₹2.5 crore cleared with 15CA/CB certification in 5 working days, TDS reduced via DTAA treaty claim
  • Family succession structured via HUF and trust deed, deferring ₹35L in capital gains tax across a 5-year reinvestment window
  • Transfer pricing study delivered in 8 weeks, satisfying arm's-length documentation requirements for a multi-entity group under Sec 92D

Tax liability is not an inevitability — it is a function of structure, timing, and documentation. Businesses and individuals who engage a tax advisor only at year-end are paying for history: the deal has closed, the year has ended, and the planning options that were available in October have expired. Those who manage their effective rate systematically engage before the transaction closes, before the assessment notice arrives, and before funds cross a border.

This practice operates across three mandates that most firms handle separately: proactive entity and transaction planning to minimize what is legally owed; cross-border and DTAA advisory to prevent double taxation and clear international remittances; and appellate defense when the department takes an adverse position. The same team that engineers the structure defends it if challenged.

Engagement outcomes

What changes when tax is treated as a managed variable

Effective rate reduction

9.7pp

Typical outcome from Sec 115BAA transition plus MAT credit optimization for mid-size domestic companies.

Assessment response filed

Day 15

Ground-wise, evidence-backed response to scrutiny or Sec 148 notice — within 15 working days of receipt.

Capital gains saved

40–60%

Via pre-transaction Sec 54 series modeling on high-value real estate and unlisted equity sales.

The structural difference

Proactive tax strategy vs. reactive year-end filing

The filing-only model

Tax as a retrospective compliance exercise

  • Advisor sees the numbers after the year closes — no ability to restructure what has already happened
  • Capital gains exemptions missed because the sale deed was signed without pre-transaction modeling
  • Generic deductions suggested without reference to judicial precedent or assessment risk
  • Scrutiny and Sec 148 notices managed reactively, without a legal dossier strong enough to hold at ITAT

Our approach

Tax modeled before the transaction, defended with the same rigor

  • Pre-transaction capital gains model prepared before any sale agreement is signed or registered
  • Entity structure and profit extraction strategy reviewed annually — not reconstructed at filing
  • Every position cited to Income Tax Act provisions and Supreme Court / High Court precedents
  • Faceless Assessment and Sec 148 responses built from the evidentiary record maintained year-round

The scope of a strategic tax engagement depends on where the client sits in the tax lifecycle. For a company considering the Sec 115BAA transition, the work is primarily analytical — modeling taxable income forward and computing the MAT credit forfeit. For a promoter group with a pending property sale, it is pre-transactional. For a company under Faceless Assessment, it is defensive. Each of the six areas below operates as a self-contained mandate or as part of a year-round advisory retainer.

Practice areas

Six areas where the engagement shows up

Corporate tax optimization

Effective rate engineering for domestic companies: Section 115BAA/BAB concessional regime transitions, MAT credit modeling, depreciation scheduling, and structuring promoter and director profit extraction to minimize aggregate tax across entities.

Capital gains & real estate

Pre-transaction modeling for residential and commercial property, unlisted equity, and business asset sales. We map the full Sec 54 / 54F / 54EC exemption chain and time the transaction to maximize the legal offset before the sale deed is registered.

International tax & DTAA

Cross-border remittance structuring, Form 15CA/CB certification, treaty benefit claims under India’s 95+ DTAA agreements, and transfer pricing studies satisfying Sec 92D arm’s-length documentation requirements for related-party transactions.

Faceless scrutiny defense

Ground-wise responses to Sec 143(3) scrutiny notices and Sec 148 reassessment proceedings. We build the evidentiary dossier before the AO’s deadline and engage directly through the Faceless Assessment portal without requiring the client to appear.

Appellate litigation

When the Assessing Officer sustains an addition, we escalate without delay. CIT(A) appeal memos are prepared with full documentary evidence; ITAT briefs are drafted to the standard required for written submissions and oral argument before the Tribunal.

Search, seizure & survey defense

Crisis representation for Sec 132 search and Sec 133A survey proceedings. We protect promoter statements, organize the documentary record in the hours immediately following, and manage the intense post-search assessment that follows over the next 24 months.

A tax position defended years later is only as strong as the documentation written on the day the decision was made.

CA Pardeep Jha · Founding Partner

Who this engagement is built for

The planning mandate suits domestic companies with taxable income above ₹1 crore, promoter groups with inter-entity complexity, and individuals with recurring capital gains events — real estate churn, ESOP liquidations, or private equity exits. The appellate practice handles any company or individual that has received a scrutiny notice, Sec 148 reassessment, or adverse CIT(A) order, regardless of size or revenue.

Mid-size domestic companies (₹5 cr – ₹500 cr revenue)

Companies that have not formalized the transition to Sec 115BAA, are accumulating MAT credits they may not fully utilize, or have inter-company transactions without arm’s-length documentation. The effective rate reduction alone typically covers the advisory cost within the first year.

Promoter groups and HNIs

Business families with multiple entities, real estate portfolios, and succession considerations. Planning covers estate freezing via HUF and trust structures, capital gains timing across financial years, and wealth extraction structured to minimize dividend distribution exposure at the corporate level.

Companies with cross-border transactions

Any entity with related-party cross-border transactions, foreign subsidiary dividends, or royalty and management fee flows needs transfer pricing documentation and withholding tax planning. The penalty for non-compliance starts at 2% of transaction value under Sec 271G — the study cost is a fraction of that.

Companies under active scrutiny

If a notice has already arrived, the response window is narrow — AO deadlines are typically 15–30 days. We take on Faceless Assessment mandates mid-stream and have reversed adverse AO orders at CIT(A) in over 90% of matters handled to date by presenting evidence the original filing did not include.

Methodology

How we work

  1. Tax diagnostic

    Review of your current effective tax rate, entity structure, historical ITRs, and open assessments. We identify the three highest-leverage optimization levers and any existing exposure before recommending any action.

  2. Transaction modeling

    For pre-transaction mandates — property sales, M&A, restructuring, or capital raises — we model the tax outcome under multiple structuring options before any documents are signed. This is where most of the value is created.

  3. Strategy execution

    Filing elections (Sec 115BAA, Sec 54, Sec 195 withholding positions), submitting Form 15CA/CB, registering the trust or LLP, or completing the slump sale — executed with a documented audit trail at each step.

  4. Documentation & compliance

    Every position taken is backed by a written legal opinion, cited to Income Tax Act sections and judicial precedents. Transfer pricing studies, 3CD certificates, and advance ruling applications are prepared to the same standard.

  5. Assessment defense & appeals

    When a notice arrives — scrutiny, Sec 148, or search — we build the evidentiary dossier, draft the response, and appear before the Assessing Officer, CIT(Appeals), and ITAT. The same team that planned the structure defends it.

Scope

What's included

  • Effective tax rate analysis with optimized rate computation and Section 115BAA transition roadmap
  • Pre-transaction capital gains model — sale value, cost inflation index, exemption map (Sec 54 / 54F / 54EC)
  • DTAA treaty analysis and Foreign Tax Credit computation for cross-border transactions
  • Form 15CA / 15CB CA certification for international remittances
  • Transfer pricing study report with arm's-length benchmarking under Sec 92D
  • Section 197 Lower Deduction Certificate application (reduces 20% flat TDS for NRI sellers)
  • Faceless Assessment response — ground-wise, evidence-backed, cited to judicial precedents
  • Section 148 reassessment legal dossier with objections under Section 148A
  • CIT(A) appeal memo with documentary evidence and written submissions
  • ITAT appeal brief and in-person representation
  • Succession and wealth structuring note — HUF, trust deed, gift deed, stamp duty analysis
  • Written tax opinion for novel or high-stakes positions, citing Supreme Court and High Court precedents

Common questions

Frequently asked

What is the legal distinction between tax planning and tax evasion?
Tax planning uses provisions expressly written into the Income Tax Act — exemptions, deductions, elections, treaty benefits — to reduce liability within the framework Parliament intended. Tax evasion conceals income or fabricates expenses. Every position we take is documented, cited to the Act and case law, and capable of surviving the highest appellate scrutiny. We do not recommend positions that depend on non-disclosure or that an independent senior counsel would not be comfortable defending.
Should our company switch to the Section 115BAA concessional tax regime?
Most domestic companies for whom MAT credit accumulation has slowed, or who have exhausted their depreciation pools, benefit materially from the 22% base rate under Sec 115BAA (effective 25.17% including surcharge and cess). The catch: the election is irrevocable and forfeits all accumulated MAT credits. The diagnostic we run before recommending the switch models the next five years of taxable income, MAT credit expiry, and depreciation impact. For companies with large pending MAT claims, the answer is sometimes to wait one or two more years.
We received a Section 148 notice. What happens next and how long will it take?
Section 148 initiates a reassessment on the ground that income has escaped assessment. The first step is filing objections under Sec 148A — there is typically a 15-day window to respond, and a hearing is required before the AO can proceed further. If the AO proceeds, the reassessment runs parallel to a normal scrutiny. Most Sec 148 matters resolve at the AO stage within 6–12 months; if the AO sustains the demand, we escalate to CIT(A), which adds another 12–18 months. Several mandates we have handled have been dropped at the 148A objection stage itself by pre-empting the AO's reasoning with documentary evidence.
Can we still do anything useful if we have already filed the return?
Depending on the financial year, yes. Revised returns can be filed within three months before the end of the assessment year. More importantly, the current year's planning — estimated advance tax, Q4 investment decisions, pre-March 31 restructuring — is always open until year-end. For prior years, a belated claim for exemption or deduction can sometimes be made through a rectification application under Sec 154, depending on the nature of the miss. The diagnostic covers both retrospective recovery and current-year optimization simultaneously.
What does a strategic tax engagement cost, and how is the fee structured?
Fees depend on scope. Advisory retainers for ongoing corporate mandates run ₹50,000–₹2,00,000 per month depending on entity count and transaction volume. One-time engagements — a property sale capital gains model, a Sec 115BAA transition analysis, or a single Faceless Assessment response — are fixed-fee, quoted after a 30-minute scoping call. Appellate work (CIT-A, ITAT) is fixed per appeal, plus certified copying and hearing expenses. We share a written proposal within 48 hours of the discovery call.
How do you handle transfer pricing documentation for our inter-company transactions?
Transfer pricing documentation under Sec 92D must demonstrate that every related-party transaction — inter-company loans, management fees, IP licensing, shared services — was priced at arm's length. We prepare the Master File, Local File, and benchmarking study using the most appropriate OECD-recognized method (CUP, cost-plus, or TNMM depending on the transaction type). The study is delivered before the filing deadline, is structured to withstand TP audit, and is updated annually to reflect changes in group structure or market comparables.

Next step

Ready to begin?

Book a 30-minute discovery call. We'll scope the engagement, confirm deliverables, and give you a fixed-fee proposal within 48 hours.